|
Judge Allows Building
Permits
on Galveston Wetlands
Houston Chronicle,
May 10, 2007
by Harvey Rice
Ruling
lets developers resume projects on Island
GALVESTON
— A federal judge dealt a setback to environmentalists
Thursday in a ruling that allows the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers to continue issuing building permits
on Galveston Island without considering the cumulative
effect on the environment.
The ruling was the
second blow for environmentalists, following a decision
by the city of Galveston to shelve a geological
hazard map intended to guide the regulation of construction
in areas subject to erosion, storm damage and sea-level
rise.
U.S. District Judge Samuel Kent lifted a 2004 injunction
on a wetlands permit that had caused the corps to
withhold all permits for construction in wetlands
on the island until the case was resolved.
The corps and developer Blackard Pirates Galveston
Development LP had asked Kent to lift the injunction,
but environmentalists had hoped he would order the
corps to assess total damage to the environment
by development on the island.
Kent's decision was welcomed by developers whose
permits have been delayed.
Bruce Reinhart, owner of the Kahala development,
said his project could have been delayed another
18 months if the judge had ruled for the plaintiffs.
Monitoring permits
The lifting of the injunction means that the corps
can continue to issue permits for development in
environmentally sensitive wetlands without taking
into consideration the total effect of all development
on the environment.
The issue is key for environmentalists, who fear
that the limited amount of land on the island is
being overdeveloped without concern for fragile
wetlands and habitat for wildlife.
The decision "underscores that we as environmentalists
can't simply rely on the corps permitting process,"
said Bob Stokes, president of the Galveston Bay
Foundation.
The foundation was not a party to the lawsuit but
closely monitors the corps permits process and backed
the plaintiffs.
Stokes called the decision a setback but said, "I
don't see it as a long-term loss."
Kent surprised attorneys for both sides by cutting
short arguments that had been scheduled to take
more than a day and issuing a decision after about
an hour.
The judge said streets already had been paved and
a channel dug for a marina on the property in dispute.
He said he had no authority to order the developer
to rip out the improvements.
Surprise outcome
Kent did not address the disputed issue of whether
he has the authority to force the corps to conduct
an environmental impact statement.
"We are all sort of a little stunned at the
moment," said Jim Blackburn, attorney for Lafitte's
Cove at Pirates' Beach Nature Society, which sought
the injunction.
Anthony Buzbee, attorney for Blackard, said, "I
was pleasantly surprised."
The controversy centers on the corps jurisdiction
over wetlands and canals dug into the island.
Critics say the corps has handed out permits to
build in the wetlands with inadequate consideration
for the environment.
"The corps seems to want to rubber-stamp every
development that comes through," said Scott
Weaver, board member of the Nature Society.
"There is also the fact that the Corps of Engineers
is ignoring the cumulative impact of all this development
on the island," Weaver said.
The Nature Society sued in 2004 because the Corps
issued a permit enabling Blackard to build 29 homes
and a marina on a lot that was being used to deposit
material dredged from existing canals.
The disappointment for environmentalists follows
a decision by the city to decline to use a $50,000
geological hazard map as a basis for regulations.
The decision was made in a report to the City Council
by City Manager Steve LeBlanc.
Mayor Lyda Ann Thomas, however, said discussion
on the geohazard map would be reopened at the next
council meeting in two weeks.
"The recommendation of the city staff is to
utilize the information from the geohazard study
as an informal tool and guide rather than formal
adoption of the geohazard study by the city council,"
|